首页> 外文OA文献 >Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Registries: Challenges and Opportunities
【2h】

Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty Registries: Challenges and Opportunities

机译:将患者报告的结果纳入全关节置换术登记处:挑战和机遇

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) registries traditionally have focused on implant longevity and rates of revision surgery. Registries would benefit from the addition of standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as pain relief and improved physical function. However, PROs have not been routinely adopted, and their incorporation into TJA registries presents challenges.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We review current PRO use by existing national registries, challenges to integrating PROs in national registries, lessons from national registries that have integrated PROs, and suggestions to guide future adoption of PROs.METHODS: We conducted a literature search of papers addressing PRO use in national knee and hip arthroplasty registries, resulting in 15 articles. These publications were supplemented by discussions with thought leaders from international registries.WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Some national TJA registries are collecting PROs and valuable research is emerging. However, challenges exist, such as selecting suitable PROs, selection bias in countries without government-mandated participation for all hospitals, and challenges with missing data.WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: The ideal system will incorporate PROs into TJA registries. In so doing, it will be important to choose suitable PROs and develop innovative methods to collect PROs to ensure complete data and sustainability.HOW DO WE GET THERE?: New methods are required to meet the challenges related to registry design, logistics of PRO collection, and registry cost and sustainability. Modifications to the traditional hospital- and implant-centric design and new procedures to collect complete data from both patients and clinicians may be necessary. For instance, England and Wales, New Zealand, and Sweden developed methods to collect PROs after TJA directly from patients and a US TJA registry collects PROs as the primary outcome. Finally, to assure long-term sustainability, PRO data must be valuable to multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.
机译:背景:传统的全关节置换术(TJA)注册表着重于植入物的寿命和翻修手术的速度。注册中心将从标准化的患者报告结局(PRO)(例如缓解疼痛和改善身体机能)中受益。然而,PRO并没有被常规采用,将其纳入TJA注册管理机构面临挑战。问题/目的:我们审查了现有国家注册管理机构当前对PRO的使用情况,将PRO集成到国家注册管理机构中的挑战,已集成PRO的国家注册管理机构的经验教训以及指导将来使用PROs的建议。方法:我们进行了文献搜索,探讨了PRO在全国膝关节和髋关节置换术登记中的使用,共有15篇文章。这些出版物还与国际注册管理机构的思想领袖进行了讨论。我们现在在哪里?:一些TJA国家注册管理机构正在收集PRO,有价值的研究正在涌现。但是,仍然存在挑战,例如选择合适的PRO,在没有政府强制所有医院参与的国家中选择偏见以及缺少数据的挑战。我们需要去哪里?:理想的系统会将PRO整合到TJA注册表中。为此,选择合适的PRO并开发创新的方法来收集PRO来确保完整的数据和可持续性非常重要。我们如何获得这些?:需要新的方法来应对与注册表设计,PRO收集的物流相关的挑战,以及注册费用和可持续性。可能需要对传统的以医院和种植体为中心的设计进行修改,并采用新程序从患者和临床医生那里收集完整的数据。例如,英格兰和威尔士,新西兰和瑞典开发了直接在患者身上进行TJA后收集PRO的方法,而美国TJA注册中心则收集PRO作为主要结果。最后,为了确保长期可持续性,PRO数据必须对多个利益相关者(包括患者,临床医生,研究人员和政策制定者)​​有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号